Measuring Risk Culture: Company Culture and Security Go Hand In Hand
Organizations set security goals for their departments. One way that they can measure if the departments are reaching those goals is by setting KPIs. KPIs can count the number of employees that have completed their online employee training modules or count the number of systems that keep their patches up to date. This helps organizations quickly measure the work that has been done and the work that still needs to be done in the organization to ensure security. If a KPI indicates one employee still needs to do their employee training for compliance regulations, HR might send the employee a message to remind them to do their employee training modules as it is a part of the companies compliance requirements. If one system shows a need to have updates, the organization may schedule an engineer to complete the work to ensure a secure system. These alerts guide organizations in managing the control environment of large systems to monitor their security culture over time when their focus may be in other areas. Automation can help organizations complete updates and receive alerts that employees might miss while they are focused on other work-related tasks.
Investigations of incidents and employee reviews can also provide insight into the security culture of an organization. When trying to measure the risk culture, the attitude of leadership and employees greatly affects the ability to measure the risk culture. Qualitative data often provides an opportunity for leadership to misinterpret the security culture to protect the reputation of their department. In an organization that prioritizes continuous improvement, feedback would provide an opportunity to improve. KPIs would be invited because they would facilitate more work for employees to create jobs, improve the security posture of the organization, and maintain good faith behavior with the public.
The attitude of leadership often trickles down into the policies and the procedures of the organization. Organizations that value their employees will have a “let’s work together to prioritize security” approach, while organizations that value quick contracts and maintaining their bottom line will often forgo security for the factory model that keeps them rich. This behavior in the long run reduces employee happiness, ruins company culture, and forces organizations to recover from harmful breaches when their poor leadership finally causes great harm to the public.
Deloitte’s Risk Culture Framework can provide guidance into different areas to consider when addressing risk culture. This assessment can guide organizations in slowly making small changes according to a roadmap that provides a strong impact over time. Small incentives for employees, for example, can create a large effect on the organization. Talking about security and ethical responsibility in work meetings only takes a minimal paragraph, but the effect over time structures the focus of the employee body. Risk reporting metrics can go a long way in providing small prompts to improve leadership overtime and set an overall mindset for improving the security posture of the organization.
References
Deloitte. (2024). Cultivating a Risk Intelligent Culture Understand, measure, strengthen, and
report. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/
center-for-corporate-governance/us-ccg-cultivating-a-risk-intelligent-culture-050212.pdf
Donovan, L. (2023, June 2). What metrics are organizations using to measure risk culture?.
Risk Leadership Network. https://www.riskleadershipnetwork.com/insights/
what-metrics-are-organisations-using-to-measure-risk-culture
Comments
Post a Comment