Federalism and Privacy: Charting the Path for U.S. Data Protection Laws
The EU GDPR strives to centralize regulatory authority for data privacy and protection for all European citizens. In the United States, adopting GDPR at the federal level would significantly restrict states' ability to enact their own regulations and shape their own data protection policies tailored to the areas of concern that align with the dominant industries in their own state. Some states have adopted policies that more closely align to GDPR to ensure their personal data is handled responsibly. For example, similar to the GDPR, the California Consumer Privacy Act includes additional provisions that allow residents to opt out of the sale of their information to third parties(Cookieyes, 2024). When other countries and states interact with California residents, they must adhere to CPPA guidelines, providing Californians with additional privacy protections not offered by other states. This approach protects local innovation while also protecting consumers' privacy rights.
As someone deeply committed to privacy, I advocate for strong data privacy protections for all Americans. I value my own privacy to the extent that my discussion posts do not include my last name. I believe that while it is essential to uphold data privacy as a fundamental right, the methods to achieve it should align with our national values. Further, different local economies may require varying policies to protect different areas of concern. While the United States has not adopted a federal approach to data privacy, it has included many additional industry specific policies that the GDPR lacks, such as HIPAA, FCRA, GLBA, COPPA (Klosowski, 2021).
During the recent COVID-19 pandemic, discussions around vaccine mandates raised significant data privacy concerns, especially regarding the tracking and handling of health data. The repercussions for healthcare professionals, coupled with emerging data on vaccine safety, highlight the complex interplay between public health measures and individual rights (Saunders, 2024) (Hippisley-Cox et al., 2021). Sometimes federal measures for the good of all require data to be revealed to ensure compliance that individuals should retain the right to keep private. An approach that manages data privacy at the state level protects Americans from federal overreach in areas that concern data privacy compliance.
While my desire to protect others and retain my own privacy pushes me to adopt the EU GDPR in the name of civil rights and setting limitations on corporate greed to protect all citizens, I would like to see the federal government provide incentives for states to develop their own policies that protect our citizens. I believe we can find a middle ground where we retain our freedom to choose as individual states while also providing stronger data privacy policies for additional protections for all Americans.
References
Cookieyes. (2024). CCPA vs GDPR. What’s the Difference? [With Infographic]. https://www.cookieyes.com/blog/ccpa-vs-gdpr/#:~:text=CCPA%20vs%20GDPR%3A%20Which%20is,is%20specific%20to%20California%20residents.
DataSunrise. (2024). Nevada Privacy Law Compliance. https://www.datasunrise.com/data-compliance/nevada/
Fieldfisher. (2023). Comparison of US state laws vs GDPR [PDF document]. https://res.cloudinary.com/fieldfisher/image/upload/v1677673010/PDFs/Comparison_of_US_State_Laws_vs_GDPR_gbgoht.pdf
Hippisley-Cox, J., Patone, M., Mei, X. W., Saatci, D., Dixon, S., Khunti, K., Zaccardi, F., Watkinson, P., Shankar-Hari, M., Doidge, J., Harrison, D. A., Griffin, S. J., Sheikh, A., & Coupland, C. A. C. (2021). Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: Self-controlled case series study. BMJ, 374, n1931.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1931
Klosowski, T. (2021). The State of Consumer Data Privacy Laws in the US (And Why It Matters). Wirecutter. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/state-of-privacy-laws-in-us/
Pop, C. (2023, November 15). EU vs US: What Are the Differences Between Their Data Privacy Laws?. Netwrix.
Saunders, J . (2024). AstraZeneca withdraws Covid vaccine worldwide after admitting jab can cause rare blood clots. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-vaccine-worldwide-after-admitting-jab-can-cause-rare-blood-clot/ar-BB1lZszR
Comments
Post a Comment